Скачать с ютуб Roberto Duran vs Iran Barkley (Highlights) в хорошем качестве

Roberto Duran vs Iran Barkley (Highlights)

October 02, 1988 Chicago Tribune At one time, Roberto Duran was the finest piece of fighting meat anywhere, a lean, juicy specimen. But now it`s time to stick a fork in him: He's done. Duran, the former three-time world champion who is tentatively scheduled to fight Iran Barkley for the World Boxing Council middleweight title Dec. 3 in Atlantic City, won a narrow 10-round split decision over Roselle`s Jeff Lanas Saturday night in the Amphitheatre. Duran, who struggled early against a surprisingly effective Lanas, was given the edge 47-46 by judge Mike Glienna and 47-45 by judge Jerry Jackubco. Judge Bill Lerch scored it 46-44 for Lanas, whose record fell to 16-4 but whose esteem soared. "What can you do?" a disappointed Lanas shrugged after keeping Duran off balance and often beating him to the punch. "Jeff Lanas always has had decisions go against him," Lanas said. "But I didn`t fight for the money (about $8,000). I thought I should have gotten the decision, but I took this fight for Jeff Lanas, for my family. To show how good Jeff Lanas is. I always wanted to fight a Duran, a Leonard, a Hearns and Hagler. Now I`ve done it, and I showed what I could do." His performance often baffled Duran, who was slow, short on many of his punches, a shell of the great fighter he once was. Fighting Barkley, a powerful puncher, in similar condition would be a felony for Duran`s handlers. Duran was constantly open for rights, but Lanas is not a strong puncher (7 knockouts in 20 fights) and wasn`t able to shake Duran. However, he often landed consecutive jabs, then moved in to tie up Duran and dominated the early rounds. "He was unorthodox," Duran said. "It took about five rounds to figure him out. But from the fifth on, I applied more pressure." Duran (84-7) scored big in the seventh round with a left cross and right uppercut combination, opening a cut over Lanas' left eye. And he landed big rights in the ninth that probably carried the fight for him. But that was hardly the unanimous opinion of about 3,000 at the Amphitheatre. Duran`s handlers, including former heavyweight contender Gerry Cooney, tried to explain away Duran`s poor showing by saying he cannot get "up" for lesser fighters like Lanas, who look for one bout to make their career. Lanas seemed to come on strong after being hit below the belt in the second round. Referee Stan Berg gave him five minutes to recover and deducted a point from Duran. Duran complained Lanas was faking and started yelling at him. Despite his anger, and probably more because of his 166 pounds and pudgy body, Duran was able to do little more than scream. Lanas constantly hit the mark with jabs and rights, moving in to tie up Duran in what often became a slow fight. But Lanas also was able to move away from Duran`s punches and penetrated his defense with surprising ease. Duran tried to put the best face on it. "I`m getting started again," he said. "I haven`t fought for six months, so you didn`t see the real Roberto Duran. But I`m getting ready to roll again." If he fights like he did Saturday again, he`s ready to get rolled. Uploaded for easier viewing - Mobile phones etc and for fight fans who perhaps don't have the time to watch these great fights in full. FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use Fair use Additionally, the fair use defense to copyright infringement was codified for the first time in section 107 of the 1976 Act. Fair use was not a novel proposition in 1976, however, as federal courts had been using a common law form of the doctrine since the 1840s (an English version of fair use appeared much earlier). The Act codified this common law doctrine with little modification. Under section 107, the fair use of a copyrighted work is not copyright infringement, even if such use technically violates section 106. While fair use explicitly applies to use of copyrighted work for criticism, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research purposes, the defense is not limited to these areas. The Act gives four factors to be considered to determine whether a particular use is a fair use: the purpose and character of the use (commercial or educational, transformative or reproductive); the nature of the copyrighted work (fictional or factual, the degree of creativity); the amount and substantiality of the portion of the original work used; and the effect of the use upon the market (or potential market) for the original work.