Скачать с ютуб Chapter 6: Resolving the Wave-Particle Duality of Photons and Questioning Quantum Mechanics в хорошем качестве

Chapter 6: Resolving the Wave-Particle Duality of Photons and Questioning Quantum Mechanics

In this video I discuss a simple, intuitive, and consistent model for understanding light that doesn't require wave-particle duality... or particles... or photons. This is a continuation of the goal of this series to unite the worlds of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Keep in mind, this is CHAPTER 6. You can see the whole playlist here: •    • A Unifying Theory of Dimensional Geom...   Here is a breakdown of this Chapter so you can skip around if you need to (it’s a long video): 00:00:00 - Introduction 00:02:12 - What is a Photon, Really? 00:04:11 - How EM Waves Work 00:07:04 - From EM Waves to Light Waves 00:09:25 - Why Does Light Act Like a Particle? 00:13:14 - Light Interactions Require a Complete Sine Wave 00:17:09 - Understanding a Projected Plane 00:22:37 - Light Starts as a Ring! 00:25:37 - Single Photons vs Streams of Light 00:28:54 - Reinterpreting the Photo-Electric Effect 00:34:05 - Reinterpreting Compton Scattering 00:38:32 - Reinterpreting the Double-Slit Experiment 00:47:43 - Facepalming the Time-Slit Experiment 00:49:50 - Untangling Polarization 00:58:53 - Explaining Non-Linear Crystals 01:04:55 - Reviewing Quantum Mechanics and Light 01:12:45 - Debunking Entanglement (for Light) 01:23:29 - Conclusion and Caveats 01:29:04 - Where Do We Go From Here? "You Don't Have to Take My Word For It!" ‪@3blue1brown‬ 's excellent breakdown of the mathematical implications and mechanics of light:    • How wiggling charges give rise to light   ‪@LookingGlassUniverse‬ 's thorough explanation of photon behavior (she gets so close!)    • What *is* a photon?   ‪@HuygensOptics‬This salty optics engineer isn't having any of your particle talk. All his videos are excellent deep-dives into light experiments and observations:    • PMT2: Photon  Bunching / Hanbury Brow...   An great paper showing the "shape" of a photon, but it's the "thicc" version because he includes the magnetic component, by Zhenglong Xu, from Tongxiang, China: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107179 The Photo-Electric Effect Here is the ‪@TheActionLab‬ video I reference. Keep in mind, he still thinks it's particles!    • Knocking Electrons With Light—The Pho...   Compton Scattering Here is a fairly complete breakdown of Compton Scattering and why it solidified our thinking of light as a particle (it was "mathic") by ‪@PhysicsExplainedVideos‬    • What is Compton Scattering?   The Double Slit Experiment If you need an introduction into the craziness that got us here:    • Single Photon Interference   Link to Applied Physics Letters publication of double-slit experiment detection test I referred to in the video: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-... References to stupid science journalism on the "time slit" experiment: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas... https://www.nature.com/articles/s4156... Polarization The video I reference for polarization is by ‪@MinutePhysics‬ here:    • Bell's Theorem: The Quantum Venn Diag...   I want to stress that I LOVE Minute Physics and they do great work. I am picking on this video because it is the BEST representation of a bad idea. However, a more down-to-earth explanation of polarization and polarizers can be found by ‪@ScienceAsylum‬ here:    • How Do Polarized Sunglasses Work?!   A written version of this and all my science videos are in the works and will be published at:   / christhebrain   While this video will not be published entirely as an official paper, there are a couple in the works with the most likely being an alternative formulation for Compton Scattering. ONGOING CORRECTION AND CLARIFICATION ROLL: CORRECTION - At about 19:34 the value for cos^2(45) should just be .5, not .525. Not sure where that came from, but it looks like we imported the wrong version of the edit. It doesn't change anything, but embarassing none-the-less. CORRECTION - At about 1:28:22 there is a misattribution of the video clip. It is 3blue1brown, not MinutePhysics. CLARIFICATION - Yes, it is true that not all EM waves are sinewaves, but sinewaves are required for what we consider "light" interactions. CLARIFICATION - A lot of you caught the "conservation of energy" issue with the non-linear crystal explanation. Rest assured, I got it sorted. It's a BIG rabbit hole, and I will cover it in the follow-up.