Скачать с ютуб Lt Col Daniel Davis: How Many Wars Can We Involve Ourselves In? в хорошем качестве

Lt Col Daniel Davis: How Many Wars Can We Involve Ourselves In?

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavis... ⚠️ U.S. Ammunition & Industrial Shortfalls The U.S. cannot produce enough munitions to sustain wars in Ukraine, Israel, and a potential conflict with Iran. Russian factories continue uninterrupted, while Ukrainian production is fragmented and inefficient. If the U.S. enters another war, it will run short of critical weapons, harming both allies and its own capabilities. 🧨 Strategic Collapse Looms Without a shift, Russia will likely win in Ukraine, and the U.S. will appear to have lost—on Trump’s watch. A war with Iran is nearly unwinnable; all Iran needs to do is survive, as the Houthis have done. Israel has failed to defeat Hamas in two years, so the idea that Iran could be quickly dismantled is unrealistic. 💥 Military Force vs. Political Reality U.S. attempts at regime change (Syria, Iraq, Libya) have not produced better outcomes—often empowering worse regimes or chaos. Iran is vastly larger and more capable than past targets; defeating it would require an immense, long-term ground war. The notion that regime change in Iran is a quick solution is dangerously naïve. 📉 Political & Moral Costs If Trump continues escalating wars, he will: Undermine his domestic coalition, Damage the Republican Party, Harm U.S. global standing, And bear personal responsibility for any failures. 💣 On Assassinations and Double Standards The U.S. and Israel regularly conduct targeted assassinations of adversaries but show outrage if it's done in return. The speaker warns this normalization of assassination will inevitably backfire, possibly even on U.S. leaders. Example: Trump ordered the killing of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, yet U.S. leaders cry foul if Iran seeks retaliation. 🧭 Moral and Strategic Hypocrisy Calls out the "rules-based order" as a sham when only enforced selectively. Criticizes Senator Lindsey Graham and others for pushing maximalist war strategies without considering feasibility or consequence. Warns that this all reflects a dangerous power-politics mindset: “We can do it to you, but you can’t do it to us.” 🚨 Conclusion: The speaker urges Trump to walk away from unwinnable wars, restore realism to U.S. policy, and stop being manipulated by Israeli hardliners or war hawks like Lindsey Graham. If not, the U.S. faces strategic overreach, moral collapse, and potential blowback—both abroad and at home.