Из-за периодической блокировки нашего сайта РКН сервисами, просим воспользоваться резервным адресом:
Загрузить через dTub.ru Загрузить через ClipSaver.ruУ нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно LAND LAW | Lecture 5.1.1 | C0-OWNERSHIP DETAILED ANSWER PLAN (Part 1) или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, которое было загружено на ютуб. Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Роботам не доступно скачивание файлов. Если вы считаете что это ошибочное сообщение - попробуйте зайти на сайт через браузер google chrome или mozilla firefox. Если сообщение не исчезает - напишите о проблеме в обратную связь. Спасибо.
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса savevideohd.ru
Are you a law student struggling with problem-based questions in land law? Do you need help structuring coursework and assessment answers effectively? This video will guide you through a step-by-step answer plan for a co-ownership problem question using the IRAC method (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion). As a former university law lecturer, assessment writer, and marker with 25 years of experience, I know exactly what examiners look for in high-scoring legal answers. By mastering the IRAC technique, you can write clear, well-structured answers and improve your performance in coursework and exams. 📌 What You’ll Learn in This Video: ✅ How to apply the IRAC method to a co-ownership problem question ✅ How to structure a first-class answer step by step ✅ Key principles of co-ownership in land law ✅ How to impress examiners with a clearand logical application of the law to the facts This is Part 1 of a detailed sample answer plan for a land law co-ownership question. It is designed to help you understand the topic and improve your answer structure for better academic performance. 📜 📝 THE QUESTION IS BELOW 👇👇👇 📌 WHAT TO WATCH NEXT ▶️ Part 2 – Co-ownership Answer Plan (Severance & TOLATA, s.15) 👉 • LAND LAW | Lecture 5.1.1 | C0-OWNERSHIP DE... ▶️ Co-ownership Revision – Five Essential Things You Need to Know 👉 • LAND LAW | CO-OWNERSHIP | 5 KEY POINTS T... ▶️ More on IRAC – What is IRAC & How Do I Use It? 👉 • 🔇 WHAT IS IRAC? | HOW DO I USE IT? | A wor... ☕Please Support the Channel If you find my videos helpful, you can buy me a coffee to support my work. Your support helps keep these resources free for law students. Thank you! 👉 https://www.buymeacoffee.com/bitesizelaw 👨🏫 ABOUT ME I’m a former university lecturer with 25 years of teaching experience in law. My channel provides practical legal insights and exam strategies to help students excel in their land law exams and trusts law studies. I aim to provide clear, example-driven content that helps you approach problem-based questions with confidence. Please note that I am no longer offering private tuition, but I continue to support law students through these videos. #lawstudents #lawlecture #landlaw #lawexamtips#LandLaw #LawExams#LawStudent #LRA2002 #LawLectures #examsuccess #ConstructiveTrusts #lawtutor 📝 📝 THE QUESTION In 2014 Tommy, Arthur, Polly and Esme bought a house together in Birmingham. Although each made different financial contributions to the purchase, the house was transferred to them as ‘beneficial joint tenants in equity’, and all four were registered as proprietors. In January 2015 Tommy met Grace, a wealthy widow, at the local bowls club and they fell deeply in love. Tommy moved out of the property to go and live with Grace, who he planned to marry. In March 2015 Tommy wrote to Arthur, Polly and Esme explaining that he had taken advice from a retired solicitor he knew and the letter was a ‘severance of his share’ and he was now a ‘tenant in common’ with them so his share of the house would pass to Grace if anything happened to him. The letter was delivered to the property but, unfortunately, Arthur did not notice it in a pile of junk mail and threw it away unopened with the rest of the junk mail. A month later, Tommy was killed in a car accident in Ireland whilst on an extended honeymoon. By his will, he left all his property to Grace. Arthur died shortly afterwards, leaving all his property to Linda. These events caused Polly and Esme to have a serious conversation about the position regarding the house. Polly told Esme that she wanted to ‘move on with her life’ as the house held too many sad memories for her. In the circumstances, she asked Esme to buy her share in the house. They agreed, verbally, that Esme would buy Polly’s share for £60,000. The next day Polly was taken to hospital where she died shortly afterwards. Her agreement with Esme was never put in writing. In her will Polly left all her property to her son, Michael. Esme recently married Freddie, who has moved into the house to live with her, bringing with him his 17-year-old son to live with them. Esme is adamant that the house should not be sold. However, Michael, who has no desire to live in the house with Freddie whom he dislikes intensely, wants it sold as soon as possible. He is deeply in debt to various loan sharks and is in desperate need of money. Grace has moved to Ireland to be near her family and also wants the property to be sold as soon as possible. Michael and Grace seek your advice as to who owns the house and whether they could force a sale. #LandLaw #IRACMethod #Co-ownership #ProblemBasedQuestions #LawExamTips #LawCoursework