Скачать с ютуб E.V. Chinnaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh | SC Reservation Sub-classification Case Explained | в хорошем качестве

E.V. Chinnaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh | SC Reservation Sub-classification Case Explained |

What was the judgement of E.V. Chinnaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh (2005)? Why was it overruled? This video explains the landmark ruling on SC sub-classification, the role of National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (NCST), and the evolution of reservation policies in India. Also includes recent updates like State of Punjab vs Davinder Singh case. #spsc #sscl #rssharma #upscaleresale #apssc #selectioncommission #hallticket #examcentre #answerkey #classiv Covered Topics: EV Chinnaiah Case Summary Article 341 of Indian Constitution SC Reservation in Andhra Pradesh Role of NCST Supreme Court Ruling on Sub-classification Perfect for UPSC, Judiciary & LLB Students. Tags: EV Chinnaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh, EV Chinnaiah judgement, EV Chinnaiah vs Andhra Pradesh summary, SC reservation case, National Commission for SC/ST, Article 341 Constitution, SC reservation sub classification, EV Chinnaiah case overruled, Davinder Singh case, Supreme Court cases India, TheLLBGuide "SC Reservation Split? EV Chinnaiah Case Explained!" "SC आरक्षण में बँटवारा? 🔴 EV चिन्नैया केस का सच!" "SC Groups Ko Divide Kar Sakte Hain? 🏛️ EV Chinnaiah Vs AP" EV Chinnaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh, SC Reservation, Article 341, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, Supreme Court India, Reservation Law, Davinder Singh case, Constitution of India, LLB Notes #thellbguide #EVChinnaiahVsStateOfAndhraPradesh #SCReservation #Article341 #NCST #SupremeCourtIndia #DavinderSinghCase #ReservationLaw #IndianConstitution #LLBNotes Questions and Answers: Q: What was the key issue in EV Chinnaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh? A: Whether states can sub-classify SCs for reservation purposes. The court ruled they cannot. Q: What is Article 341 of the Indian Constitution? A: It empowers the President to specify SCs for each state. States cannot alter this list. Q: What did the court say about SCs being a homogenous class? A: SCs notified under Article 341 are treated as one single class and cannot be further divided. Q: What was the impact of the EV Chinnaiah ruling? A: It prevented states from categorizing SCs further, ensuring uniform treatment. Q: Which case overruled the EV Chinnaiah judgment? A: State of Punjab vs Davinder Singh allowed sub-classification of SCs based on empirical data. Example From Media: Show: Satyamev Jayate (Season 1, Episode on Caste Discrimination) — Aamir Khan discusses systemic caste inequality; use this for intro overlay or reference. Movie: Article 15 (Netflix) — Parallel themes around SC/ST rights and constitutional interpretation. This Video is based on below content: The landmark case, E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2005), dealt with the issue of sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) for reservation purposes. The Supreme Court, in a 5-judge bench decision, ruled that SCs, as notified under Article 341 of the Constitution, form a single, homogenous class and that any further sub-classification by state governments was unconstitutional. This decision emphasized that the Presidential notification under Article 341 is the basis for determining the constitution of SCs, and states cannot create their own classifications. Key aspects of the case and its implications: Homogenous Class: The court held that SCs, as a class, are considered homogenous and cannot be further divided for the purpose of reservations. Presidential Notification: The ruling underscored that the President's notification under Article 341 is the sole authority for identifying and specifying SCs. State's Limitations: The judgment restricted the power of state governments to sub-classify SCs, preventing them from creating further categories within the existing list. Impact on Reservation Policies: This decision had a significant impact on reservation policies across states, as it limited the ability of states to create their own sub-categories within the SC/ST lists. Overruled by Recent Judgement: It's worth noting that the E.V. Chinnaiah ruling was later overruled by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab vs. Davinder Singh. The more recent decision allows for sub-classification of SCs and STs based on empirical data demonstrating backwardness and inadequate representation within the community. Evolution of the Law: The E.V. Chinnaiah judgment, while a landmark in its time, has been revisited due to evolving legal and social perspectives. The more recent decision in State of Punjab vs. Davinder Singh (and subsequent cases) has opened the door for states to implement sub-classifications within SC/ST categories to address disparities and ensure more equitable distribution of reservation benefits. This ongoing debate highlights the complexities of reservation policies in India and the continuous efforts to balance social justice with the need for equitable distribution of opportunities.